Re: [dev] New Suckless computer language?

From: Sylvain BERTRAND <sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:18:11 +1100

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 02:52:10PM -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Cág <caoc_AT_riseup.net> wrote:
> >> Is there any need for a new language,
> >
> >
> > No
> >
> >> or is C good enough?
> >
> >
> > Yes
> >
> > There is Go already, if C is not enough.
>
> And Rust.

There is no "TinyGo" neither "TinyRust" and they are garbage collected in their
basic profile. Language "theorists" should consider ML based languages too.

Go compiler/sdk is that c++ dependent (language and runtime) kludge which is
gcc now (go is google and gcc becoming hard dependent on a c++98
compiler/runtime is google mistake too), and rust compiler/sdk has similar
issues.

Then, it's fairly enough for me to say they are not "suckless".

my 2c opinion.

-- 
Sylvain
Received on Sun Jul 24 2016 - 02:18:11 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Jul 24 2016 - 02:24:12 CEST