Re: [dwm] some useful changes

On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:53:16PM +0100, Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
> This looks like a cleaner solution to me. The only disadvantage is,
> that dwm tests all keydefs. A little overhead, but this is not too bad
> in my eyes.

In worst case there might be people having 100 shortcuts defined, but
looping 100 times is nearly nothing compared to what goes on
during arrange() ;)

Regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361