Re: [dwm] Fwd: Re: dwm + java

From: Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:29:06 +0100

On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 05:11:20PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 12/9/06, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org> wrote:
> >What I'm most interested in is, how do those Java apps behave if
> >you don't use a WM at all. If they behave same weird, then it's
> >definately not a dwm fault.
> >Any X application which is ICCCM-compliant should work even
> >without a WM at all.
>
> They work fine for me without any WM at all. So apparently there's
> some bad interaction between java and dwm (the problem may still be at
> either side though).

During sleep I awaked and got another suspect, check if it's
gravitate's fault in just adding a return; at the very
beginning (I believe, that gravitate is totally useless with no
frames, but we will see).

Regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
Received on Sun Dec 10 2006 - 11:29:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:33:40 UTC