Re: [dwm] Xinerama: back to the roots

From: y i y u s <yiyu.jgl_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 00:27:37 +0100

> well, I agree that the current Xinerama support is also not the
> way to go. First of all it is far to complex in the code for
> the benefit it implements. And around 90% of all dwm users have
> no Xinerama or Multihead support in my eyes.
>
> So I believe a real invention will be a tile() with Xinerama
> support instead and a status bar which can be positioned more
> flexible (just using a certain screen only to save screen real
> estate).
>

As one of the users with just one monitor, I'm very happy with this
decision. Anyway, I will keep thinking about a good xinerama
implementation.
But what I would really like is a pre-release of st, what's the new
estimated time? I think we can forget about mid February... and a new
dwm would be great too, with or without xinerama. Any idea about when
all this will be available? (take your time, I'm just asking, you
know)

greeets,

-- 
- yiyus || JGL .
Received on Tue Mar 04 2008 - 00:27:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:22:34 UTC