Re: [dwm] still simplicity or featureitis?

From: Jeremy O'Brien <obrien654j_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:52:20 -0400

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:48:49PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 3/13/08, markus schnalke <meillo_AT_marmaro.de> wrote:
> > With the multihead thing comming up, I realize a lot of new ideas in
> > different directions. Changes became big again and everything is a
> > little bit experimental.
> > Also complexity increased and the code base as well.
>
> i consider current tileh and tilev an improvement and more general
> solution than previous tile
>
> also window geom params now allows easy bottomstack, togglebar, etc setup.
>
> the floating mode flag in the layout is a bit ugly
>
> focus + restack is not optimal but i had the same feeling before
>
> monocle has some problems (if floating then every popup window is
> maximized, if not then it cannot be used as togglemax replacement for
> floating windows and has other side effects) but it's a useful layout
>
> imho current tip is not worse than earlier versions
>

Personally, I've switched to wmii until dwm reaches a more usable state
again... The changes are just too much for me to get used to and I feel
like it has gone in a backwards direction...

-- 
Jeremy O'Brien aka neutral_insomniac
GPG key: 0xB1140FDB http://pohl.ececs.uc.edu/~jeremy/jeremy.asc
Linux lucifer 2.6.24-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT
i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1400MHz

Received on Thu Mar 13 2008 - 16:52:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:25:28 UTC