Re: [dwm] nanox

From: Jacob Todd <jaketodd422_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:39:56 -0400

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:08:07PM +0200, pancake wrote:
> ....

Seems interesting, but instead of reinventing the wheel, why don't we just clean
up X.org and submit patches back upstream? Rewriting/implementing X.org seems li
ke more work than it's worth, but cleaning up Xorg would be better for everyone.
Received on Wed May 20 2009 - 00:39:56 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: carmen: "Re: [dwm] nanox"
Previous message: pancake: "[dwm] nanox"
In reply to: pancake: "[dwm] nanox"
Next in thread: carmen: "Re: [dwm] nanox"
Reply: carmen: "Re: [dwm] nanox"
Reply: Uriel: "Re: [dwm] nanox"
Reply: Anselm R Garbe: "Re: [dwm] nanox"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 20 2009 - 00:48:05 UTC