Re: [wmii] removing 9base dependency, depending on plan9port as option, switching back to sh?

From: Nico Golde <nico_AT_ngolde.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:51:40 +0100

Hi,
* Anselm R. Garbe <garbeam_AT_wmii.de> [2006-02-24 12:17]:
[...]
> What do you think? I'm convinced that is the better way, to
> spread out wmii-3. Additionally I'm willing to support Russ Cox
> to push plan9port forward to be included in default
> distributions.

What about all old arguments like rc is much faster because
its statical linked etc.? I mean what was the exact reason,
why its bad to depend on it? I mean sure more people will
use it if its not depending on it, but this cant be the real
reason?
Regards Nico

-- 
Nico Golde - JAB: nion_AT_jabber.ccc.de | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
Forget about that mouse with 3/4/5 buttons -
gimme a keyboard with 103/104/105 keys!

Received on Fri Feb 24 2006 - 12:53:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:00:10 UTC