Re: [dev] dwm only?

Other than ad hominems, do you have any evidence that my statement
regarding the amount of non-dwm related traffic in the dwm@ list is
untrue?

Thank you

uriel

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:45 PM, pmarin <pacogeek_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Uriel this is not 9fans, please send your stupid commets to another list.
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Stop whining, the dwm list had tons of non-dwm chatter, if you are not
>> interested in one thread, press the delete button.
>>
>> uriel
>>
>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Benjamin Conner <tommydabomby_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list?
>>>
>>> That's a great idea!
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 8:19 AM, pmarin <pacogeek_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Benjamin Conner <tommydabomby_AT_gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > I'd like to know this too.  I would only like dwm ones like the lists
>>>> > used
>>>> > to be.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Dusan <ef_dva_AT_yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Is there a way to get only dwm related emails? Since lists are merged I
>>>> >> get bunch of wmii related ones and frankly I don't need them at all.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thanks.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Sun May 24 2009 - 15:11:47 UTC