Re: [dev] dwm only?

On (24/05/09 23:30), bill lam wrote:
> To: dev_AT_suckless.org
> From: bill lam <cbill.lam_AT_gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [dev] dwm only?
> Mail-Followup-To: dev_AT_suckless.org
> Reply-To: dev mail list <dev_AT_suckless.org>
> List-Id: dev mail list <dev.suckless.org>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-04-29)
>
> On Sun, 24 May 2009, pmarin wrote:
> > The problem, I think, is that a dwm user doesn't care about wmii stuff
> > and probably wmii users feel the same about dwm. The no-dwm stuff in
> > dwm list is about other suckless stuff but not wmii becouse already we
> > have chosen the wm to use.
>
> I suppose I did not care for the merge because I thought that wmii
> mailing list was already dormant then.
>
>

It is! It's just that after merge, wmii's part become abnormally active.

:-)

-Ph

-- 
Premysl "Anydot" Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/
-
I'm a signature virus. Please add me to your signature and help me spread!