El Wed, Jun 10, 2009 11:21:28PM +0200, Uriel escribió:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Szabolcs Nagy<nszabolcs_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 6/8/09, Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I forgot to mention that the German Pirate Party has taken a more
> >> 'expansive' approach to their positions, and that actually has put off
> >> a few people I know from voting for them.
> >>
> >> I hope for the next election they learn from the Swedish Pirate Party
> >> and they stick to the topics where we all agree.
> >
> > the problem is that one can only vote for one party
> >
> > there are many political issues so why would i vote for a party which
> > only covers one?
>
> Given that most people don't vote at all, I don't think this is an issue.
>
> And your argument cuts both ways, if you vote for a party that has
> positions on more issues, it is very likely you will disagree with
> many of their opinions, so why should you vote for them?
Good points!
And there are also new issues that come up only within a legislative period, i.e. after the
elections.
All the above remember me of the idea of a party in which its members (= voters) decide all the time
on the position of their representatives.
-- Iván F. Villanueva B. Initiator http://StopSoftwarePatents.eu Board member of FFII e.V. http://www.ffii.org Twitter: https://twitter.com/ffii Jabber: ivan_AT_ogai.org VoIP: sip:ogai_AT_ekiga.net GSM: +49 160 23 160 13Received on Thu Jun 11 2009 - 11:30:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 11 2009 - 11:36:01 UTC