Re: [dev] Suckless mail client solution?

From: Robert C Corsaro <>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:56:00 -0400

markus schnalke wrote:
> [2009-10-15 21:47]
>> Well, I can't tell which view is more useful in mutt -- threaded or
>> timeline. Which is proved by the fact that I have changed couple of times
>> in the past the default view from one to another, and switched views at
>> least once a day anyway. Which proves for me that they are equally useful
>> for different tasks: [...]
> IMO threads are very useful for mailing lists. (With nmh, I really miss
> them there.)
> The inbox, in contrast, is best sorted by time, I think.

I've started to use nntp for mailing lists. It seems to be better, but
I can't put my finger on exactly why. What does suckless thing? What's
the best suckless newsreader? I've been using pan but I'd rather a
command line program.
Received on Sun Oct 18 2009 - 14:56:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 18 2009 - 15:00:04 UTC