Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (aka suckless word processing solution-2)

From: markus schnalke <meillo_AT_marmaro.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:21:13 +0200

[2009-10-18 18:35] Anselm R Garbe <anselm_AT_garbe.us>
> 2009/10/18 Tor Aqissiaq <toraqissiaq_AT_googlemail.com>:
> > XHTML, parsed using an XML parser is very specifically defined and
> > does not look different in different browsers, but few people serve
> > XHTML documents with the application/xhtml+xml headers, because IE
> > refuses to parse XML. XHTML parsed as HTML + no better than HTML. I
> > already use XHTML for sending documents to my friends.
>
> XHTML is a sick child that will die soon.

Should and will are a big difference. Don't forget the ``bad real
world'' in your prediction.

Bad stuff often lives long, especially when many people don't see that
it's bad.

meillo
Received on Sun Oct 18 2009 - 18:21:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 18 2009 - 18:48:03 UTC