Re: [dev] [OT] Java Hate

What about this one?
http://xinutec.org/~pippijn/en/why-not-use_java.xhtml

Moritz

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:09:30AM +0100, Uriel wrote:
> I think Paul Graham's criticism's are much more relevant and timeless:
> http://www.paulgraham.com/javacover.html
>
> In short, the real problems with java are inherent to its design
> motivation, and can't be fixed with new features, libraries or other
> such 'improvements' (actually in many ways the features that they have
> added to Java have made things worse, auto-boxing and generics are a
> really huge mes of almost C++ proportions, nobody really understands
> how they work, not even the people that designed them.)
>
>
> uriel
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:37 AM, pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com> wrote:
> > This is for Java 1.0.2
> >
> > We are in 1.7 I wonder if those logical side effects are still there.
> >
> > On Nov 18, 2009, at 7:57 PM, "Michael P. Soulier"
> > <msoulier_AT_digitaltorque.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> On 18/11/09 Michael P. Soulier said:
> >>
> >>> On 18/11/09 Uriel said:
> >>>
> >>>> http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/java
> >>
> >> And another http://www.cs.arizona.edu/projects/sumatra/hallofshame/
> >>
> >> Mike
> >> --
> >> Michael P. Soulier <msoulier_AT_digitaltorque.ca>
> >> "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It
> >> takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite
> >> direction." --Albert Einstein
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 19 2009 - 09:37:43 UTC