I think Paul Graham's criticism's are much more relevant and timeless:
http://www.paulgraham.com/javacover.html
In short, the real problems with java are inherent to its design
motivation, and can't be fixed with new features, libraries or other
such 'improvements' (actually in many ways the features that they have
added to Java have made things worse, auto-boxing and generics are a
really huge mes of almost C++ proportions, nobody really understands
how they work, not even the people that designed them.)
uriel
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:37 AM, pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com> wrote:
> This is for Java 1.0.2
>
> We are in 1.7 I wonder if those logical side effects are still there.
>
> On Nov 18, 2009, at 7:57 PM, "Michael P. Soulier"
> <msoulier_AT_digitaltorque.ca> wrote:
>
>> On 18/11/09 Michael P. Soulier said:
>>
>>> On 18/11/09 Uriel said:
>>>
>>>> http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/java
>>
>> And another http://www.cs.arizona.edu/projects/sumatra/hallofshame/
>>
>> Mike
>> --
>> Michael P. Soulier <msoulier_AT_digitaltorque.ca>
>> "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It
>> takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite
>> direction." --Albert Einstein
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 19 2009 - 01:09:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Nov 19 2009 - 01:12:01 UTC