2009/11/20 Kris Maglione <maglione.k_AT_gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:35PM -0600, A.J. Gardner wrote:
>>
>> I'm interested in math and CASs, but my opinions on available software
>> are ill-formed and mostly ignorant. Does anyone else here have an
>> interest in this topic, broadly speaking? If so, do you have any
>> preferences for one package over another? Have you found any math
>> software that seem to follow the worse-is-better design model?
>
> Don't be silly. There's nothing like a "suckless" CAS, at least nothing
> remotely approaching the simplicity of suckless.org software. Computer
> algebra and calculus are complex and computationally intensive. They can't
> (and arguably shouldn't) be simplified beyond a point.
Why not? I think it should be possible to have very minimalist and
specialized CAS', they managed to do that in the 50s and 60s, why not
today?
Cheers,
Anselm
Received on Fri Nov 20 2009 - 18:39:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Nov 20 2009 - 18:48:02 UTC