That's actually my point - wikipedia is artificially enforcing notability so
we should artificially create notability.*
*Not a serious suggestion.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:26 PM, hiro <23hiro_AT_googlemail.com> wrote:
> Well, that's exactly the point.
> Wikipedia is trying to artificially enforce notability, which is of
> course going to fail miserably...
>
> On 2/24/10, Charlie Kester <corky1951_AT_comcast.net> wrote:
> > On Wed 24 Feb 2010 at 07:15:42 PST hiro wrote:
> >>It seems like this guy is just mocking wikipedia's notability guideline.
> >
> > After reading the discussion, I'm beginning to wonder about wikipedia's
> > notability. If it's not mentioned on cat-v.org, it's not worth knowing
> > about. ;)
> >
> > If wikipedia deletes articles like the one on dwm, it will just be that
> > much less interesting to me.
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Wed Feb 24 2010 - 18:44:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 24 2010 - 18:48:01 UTC