So there is consensus. Perhaps we can edit that stupid wikipedia page.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability
On 2/24/10, Niki Yoshiuchi <aplusbi_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> That's actually my point - wikipedia is artificially enforcing notability so
> we should artificially create notability.*
>
> *Not a serious suggestion.
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:26 PM, hiro <23hiro_AT_googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Well, that's exactly the point.
>> Wikipedia is trying to artificially enforce notability, which is of
>> course going to fail miserably...
>>
>> On 2/24/10, Charlie Kester <corky1951_AT_comcast.net> wrote:
>> > On Wed 24 Feb 2010 at 07:15:42 PST hiro wrote:
>> >>It seems like this guy is just mocking wikipedia's notability guideline.
>> >
>> > After reading the discussion, I'm beginning to wonder about wikipedia's
>> > notability. If it's not mentioned on cat-v.org, it's not worth knowing
>> > about. ;)
>> >
>> > If wikipedia deletes articles like the one on dwm, it will just be that
>> > much less interesting to me.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
Received on Wed Feb 24 2010 - 18:51:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 24 2010 - 19:00:03 UTC