Re: [dev] Re: Simple port scanner again (was: GSoC 2010)

From: Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:09:57 +0100

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Dmitry Maluka <dmitrymaluka_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Threads are good for concurrency. I guess portscan is not the case.

What 'threads'? Pthreads certainly are not good for anything, and
specially not for concurrency.

uriel
Received on Sat Mar 06 2010 - 19:09:57 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: anonymous: "Re: [dev] Re: Simple port scanner again (was: GSoC 2010)"
Previous message: Uriel: "Re: [dev] Re: Simple port scanner again (was: GSoC 2010)"
In reply to: Dmitry Maluka: "Re: [dev] Re: Simple port scanner again (was: GSoC 2010)"
Next in thread: Uriel: "Re: [dev] Re: Simple port scanner again (was: GSoC 2010)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Mar 06 2010 - 19:12:04 UTC