On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Stephane Sezer <thrashboul_AT_free.fr> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:37:54 +0100
> Alexander Surma <alexander.surma_AT_googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> And for the bloat: Git is sometimes percieved as somewhat more bloated
>> (>100 little tools instead of 1 like hg) - that depends on the point
>> of view.
>
> Is this still true ?
Actually it is sad that git moved from 'small specialized tools'
towards a more centralized/monolithic model. But nobody will miss the
dependency on perl...
uriel
Received on Wed Mar 10 2010 - 21:28:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Mar 10 2010 - 21:36:03 UTC