Re: [dev] terminal that accepts any size

To be honest, I did indeed try sam and acme, but I went back to vim.

I don't want to start another boring flame war: vim is just more convenient
for me and it comes to a set of pre-implemented features that I like (and
don't want to implement myself for sam or acme).

As the saying about "democracy" in politics, "vim is not perfect, but I
haven't found anything better, yet".

"Screen" is another utility I wasn't able to use with 9term, maybe more
useful than vim ;-)

L.

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:55 AM, hiro <23hiro_AT_googlemail.com> wrote:

> Sorry, it's a different and incompatible concept.
> There is no need for less any more (Toggle scrolling with middle-click
> scroll).
> If you need vi it's the wrong way. But since you got that far you
> could also try acme and sam as an alternative :P
>
> On 3/23/10, Lorenzo Bolla <lbolla_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > I gave 9term a quick try, but I couldn't get neither vim nor less work
> > properly with it (they both complain about 9term being an "unknown"
> > terminal).
> >
> > Is any of you guys using 9term with either vim or less?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > L.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Jonas Bernoulli <jonas_AT_bernoulli.cc>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 19:19, Connor Lane Smith <cls_AT_lubutu.com>
> wrote:
> >> > On 22 March 2010 18:13, Jonas Bernoulli <jonas_AT_bernoulli.cc> wrote:
> >> >> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 21:40, hiro <23hiro_AT_googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > 9term
> >> >>
> >> >> I couldn't download it from http://www.cs.usyd.edu.au/~matty/9term/.
> >> >> Where else should I get it?
> >> >
> >> > It's distributed with Plan 9 Port: http://swtch.com/plan9port/
> >>
> >> Thanks. It's really about time that I try that out.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
Received on Tue Mar 23 2010 - 10:52:18 UTC