Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q

From: markus schnalke <>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:52:11 +0200

[2010-04-12 13:30] Szabolcs Nagy <>
> On 4/12/10, Uriel <> wrote:
> > What is your question?
> he just pointed out that 'sed 11q' incorrectly listed as an alternative
> to 'head' on cat-v (the correct alternative would be 'sed 10q')


Thanks to all who replied. Now I understand, why one might want to use
11q instead of 10q.

> but it's a minor detail..

Nonetheless I think it should be changed to 10q on the harmful
website, because that's the correct replacement. But, I agree that
it is only a detail, actually.

Received on Wed Apr 14 2010 - 11:52:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 14 2010 - 12:12:02 UTC