On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:52 PM, markus schnalke <meillo_AT_marmaro.de> wrote:
> Nonetheless I think it should be changed to 10q on the harmful
> website, because that's the correct replacement. But, I agree that
> it is only a detail, actually.
Part of the whole point is that the number before the q can be
whatever the hell you like, if people are too thick or pedantic to
understand this, there is nothing I can do about it.
uriel
Received on Wed Apr 14 2010 - 22:55:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 14 2010 - 23:00:02 UTC