[dev] Re: stali and OpenBSD userland etc.

On 04/14/10 12:23, Claudio M. Alessi wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:29:10PM +0200, pancake wrote:
>> I wrote tac in 9base a week ago... I would really prefer 9base before other alternatives if we can choose. Most of them are valid replacements
> +1
>
> I would prefer plan 9 userland againsts OpenBSD (where possible). After all
> it's a suckless distribution and it seems that plan 9 userland sucks less than
> OpenBSD one.
>
> Regards,
> Claudio M. Alessi
>
This raises the question, does stali aim to be POSIX (or even X/Open)
compliant?

Thomas.
Received on Thu Apr 15 2010 - 06:04:39 UTC