On 15 April 2010 07:04, finkler <finkler_AT_officinamentis.org> wrote:
> On 04/14/10 12:23, Claudio M. Alessi wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:29:10PM +0200, pancake wrote:
>>> I wrote tac in 9base a week ago... I would really prefer 9base before other alternatives if we can choose. Most of them are valid replacements
>> +1
>>
>> I would prefer plan 9 userland againsts OpenBSD (where possible). After all
>> it's a suckless distribution and it seems that plan 9 userland sucks less than
>> OpenBSD one.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Claudio M. Alessi
>>
> This raises the question, does stali aim to be POSIX (or even X/Open)
> compliant?
Well not really, all it targets is usability.
android isn't POSIX compliant and is probably more wide spread now
then Linux desktops... ;)
Cheers,
Anselm
Received on Thu Apr 15 2010 - 06:39:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 15 2010 - 06:48:02 UTC