Re: [dev] [sic] tok and ctok functions

From: anonymous <aim0shei_AT_lavabit.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 01:57:33 +0400

Update. Renamed one variable (msg to par, cause it is for command
parameters), rearranged parsein so it don't repeat the same line two
times.

Is there any maintainer for "sic"? Please review patch, I hope it can
be applied, it is not for adding features, it just cleans and fixes
the code.

text/plain attachment: sic.diff

Received on Fri Apr 16 2010 - 21:57:33 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jakub Lach: "Re: [dev] Anyone have the traditional vi working on the xterm?"
Previous message: Samuel Baldwin: "[dev] Re: tabbed-list patch"
In reply to: anonymous: "Re: [dev] [sic] tok and ctok functions"
Next in thread: Anselm R Garbe: "Re: [dev] [sic] tok and ctok functions"
Reply: Anselm R Garbe: "Re: [dev] [sic] tok and ctok functions"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 16 2010 - 22:00:05 UTC