On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 07:29:29PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:25:04 -0400
> Jacob Todd <jaketodd422_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:47:07PM +0400, anonymous wrote:
> > > Do we really need that "What Works" list on
> > > http://surf.suckless.org/? It tells reader what sites works with
> > > WebKit?
> > >
> > Some sites do silly things with cookies, and they don't work, or
> > don't work too well with surf. I think it's somewhat usefull.
> >
>
> then maybe it's better to list what *doesn't* work, with a short note
> why.
Yes, it really does NOT make sense to list all sites that DO work well.
This list would be ether far from being complete or close to infinite.
- yoshi
Received on Thu Apr 22 2010 - 17:56:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 22 2010 - 18:12:01 UTC