On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:29:29 +0200, Dieter Plaetinck <dieter_AT_plaetinck.be>
wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:25:04 -0400
> Jacob Todd <jaketodd422_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:47:07PM +0400, anonymous wrote:
>> > Do we really need that "What Works" list on
>> > http://surf.suckless.org/? It tells reader what sites works with
>> > WebKit?
>> >
>> Some sites do silly things with cookies, and they don't work, or
>> don't work too well with surf. I think it's somewhat usefull.
>>
>
> then maybe it's better to list what *doesn't* work, with a short note
> why.
>
> Dieter
What Works list would be nice ... and better if someone who knows C better
than me could write a patch to surf so when site (hopefully not every forum
of hobbies) works, you could just hit hotkey and it submits url (FE
http://underdomain.this-site-doesnt-suck.much/ not whole url ofcourse) to
the list.
- Erno
Received on Thu Apr 22 2010 - 17:59:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 22 2010 - 18:24:02 UTC