On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:09:33PM +0200, Premysl Hruby wrote:
> > Conclusion: 0.7 seconds is somewhat noticeable lag. It's another
> > question whether it's worth the effort to write the C program, but
> > hey, it's been done already.
>
> Well, I (and others possibly) have no concern about cache miss, my files
> in $PATH doesn't changes every five minutes :-)
I have cache misses rather often, and the delay *is* annoying. I'd be a
happy user of the C rewrite.
Regards,
Mate
Received on Wed May 19 2010 - 10:11:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 19 2010 - 10:24:02 UTC