Re: [dev] Is there a reason to use install(1)?

From: markus schnalke <meillo_AT_marmaro.de>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 11:49:30 +0200

[2010-05-29 23:37] Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57_AT_fastmail.fm>
> This didn't seem to reach the list the first time, resending to check
> if it's a glitch.

The mail already reached the list the first time. See:
http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1005/4394.html

meillo
Received on Sun May 30 2010 - 09:49:30 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ethan Grammatikidis: "Re: [dev] Is there a reason to use install(1)?"
Previous message: Kris Maglione: "Re: [dev] dwm-5.8.1 / dmenu-4.1.1"
In reply to: Ethan Grammatikidis: "Re: [dev] Is there a reason to use install(1)?"
Next in thread: Ethan Grammatikidis: "Re: [dev] Is there a reason to use install(1)?"
Reply: Ethan Grammatikidis: "Re: [dev] Is there a reason to use install(1)?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun May 30 2010 - 10:00:03 UTC