Re: [dev] Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?

Matthew Bauer dixit (2010-06-09, 17:49):

> Would Mercurial be considered suckless?
>
> I've always wondered why suckless projects use Mercurial instead of the
> standard git for version control that is used by most Linux projects.
>
> Isn't Git more simpler than Mercurial?

See the thread from 13 February – this has been discussed already
(Message-ID:
<f67dd0d31002131914q7bd9d6d8gadb2e185e534dc3b_AT_mail.gmail.com>)

-- 
[a]