Re: [dev] [OT] glibc (was: [9base] rc can't find .)

From: Moritz Wilhelmy <crap_AT_wzff.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:02:02 +0200

Do we have feature-complete alternatives to GNU libc?
eglibc is not an option, since it's based solely on the point that Drepper is
an asshole.
From what I heard, uClibc is incomplete, as is klibc and dietlibc..
What else do we have? Android libc? How many programs depend on glibc?
Received on Fri Jun 11 2010 - 11:02:02 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jan Winkelmann: "Re: [dev] [9base] rc can't find ."
Previous message: crap_AT_wzff.de: "Re: [dev] XDG directories"
In reply to: Anselm R Garbe: "Re: [dev] [9base] rc can't find ."
Next in thread: Kris Maglione: "Re: [dev] [OT] glibc (was: [9base] rc can't find .)"
Reply: Kris Maglione: "Re: [dev] [OT] glibc (was: [9base] rc can't find .)"
Reply: pancake: "Re: [dev] [OT] glibc"
Reply: Uriel: "Re: [dev] [OT] glibc (was: [9base] rc can't find .)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jun 11 2010 - 11:12:02 UTC