Re: [dev] pertag and bstack patches to dwm incompatible

From: Donald Allen <donaldcallen_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 21:43:52 -0400

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Donald Allen <donaldcallen_AT_gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:08 AM, <u_AT_netbeisser.de> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 02:44:42AM +0200, Aur?lien Aptel wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Donald Allen <donaldcallen_AT_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > I'm an old-timer, very familiar with rcs and cvs and just a bit
>> > > with svn. No git, no hg.)
>> > > /Don
>> >
>> > Read this really nice tutorial : http://hginit.com
>>
>> so I think, his "hg pull" behaved like "cvs up", which is very annoying
>> too
>> in case of commits. (when you do it before)
>>
>
> So far, I'm getting nowhere with hg, despite the suggestions for how to
> proceed. I think I need to RTFM, starting with the tutorial suggested above.
> I would like to point out again, however, that Andrew grossly underestimated
> the overhead involved here, making the mistake of assuming that I knew what
> he knows. I'll get it fixed (I've used cvs for years and if you can do that
> and still type complete sentences, learning hg should not be that much of a
> problem), but it will take a bit of reading.
>
> /Don
>

Ok, I managed to achieve a detente with hg and got my pertag-compatible
alternatve version of the dwm bstack patch pushed out.

/Don

>
>
>>
>> regards
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Stefan Kuttler ==*== nc.netbeisser.de
>>
>>
>
Received on Fri Jul 09 2010 - 03:43:52 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 09 2010 - 03:48:01 CEST