Re: [dev] How about sta.li ?

From: Jens Staal <staal1978_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:10:52 +0200

Another, sort of related question: how has it worked out with the
static binaries of 9base etc built with bionic?

I was thinking, perhaps a "static binary repository" could be a good start :)

2010/7/31 Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com>:
> Hi Krankkatze,
>
> On 31 July 2010 19:43, Krankkatze <krankkatze_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm very interested in the sta.li project and would like to know if the
>> project is still active or not, and if any help could be brought. Thanks!
>
> It's inactive atm, but I did plenty work in the sta.li area that is
> still unpublished, also because I did some sort of it at work.
> I plan to resolve the issues during the next weeks and will provide an
> update by then.
>
> Help is definitely welcome, particularly in the area of patching ld in
> order to produce static libraries when shared objects are requested in
> a tee-like fashion and to statically link executables when shared
> objects are supplied. I started some ld patches a while ago, but they
> are half way, but I'm happy to provide them on request.
>
> HTH,
> Anselm
>
>
Received on Sat Jul 31 2010 - 23:10:52 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jul 31 2010 - 23:12:02 CEST