On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:27 AM, thuban <thuban_AT_singularity.fr> wrote:
>>
>> I just changed the colour scheme in drawbar() so that unoccupied tags
>> are invisible (by making the text colour the same as the background).
>> This was enough for me, as I was mostly concerned with the visual
>> noise of all the unoccupied tags.
>>
>> The unoccupied tags aren't completely useless to me. I prefer to move
>> to an unoccupied tag and then open a new application (as opposed to
>> opening the new application and then sending it away), so I need to be
>> able to view unoccupied tags.
>>
>
> But what do you think to create the tag justs when you move in? I'm
> just thinking to the same comportement of wmii. Especially, I would
> like to be able to rename tags,
You can, but only at compile time. Just change the 'tags' vector in
config.h, re-build and re-install.
and create them as I want (and
> automatically remove them when they are no more used ).
Again, i3 does exactly this. If you care a lot about this behavior, I
suggest you have a look at it. It's quite good, but so is dwm. They
each have somewhat different strengths and which you use is a matter
of what is important to you. I am continuing to use dwm because I
don't much care about seeing only occupied tags and there are some
things that I *do* care about that dwm does a bit better.
> Sure, it must be really easy to do it with 9p.
> It might look like an appearance question, true, but it is also to have
> dwm more flexible to use (because it is very configurable when
> compiling, but this configuration is static).
>
>
Received on Fri Aug 06 2010 - 14:40:09 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 06 2010 - 14:48:02 CEST