On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 06:38:35PM -0400, TJ Robotham wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> > ^D isn't an emacsism insofar as using it in bash when not at the end
> > of the line works the same way. That said, I'm aware bash is a
> > monster. However:
>
> Actually, it is an emacsism insomuch as bash's manpage specifically describes
> the default line editing commands as emacs-style, in contrast to a vi-style that
> can be enabled in its place.
And sucks totally, because that's what bash is about.
Received on Tue Aug 10 2010 - 00:57:42 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Aug 10 2010 - 01:24:03 CEST