On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:45:13 -0400
Kris Maglione <maglione.k_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 03:29:35PM -0700, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
> >On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Alexander Teinum <ateinum_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> http://github.com/alexanderte/flo
> >
> >Congratulations on choosing the ISC license for your project. Too
> >many projects still use MIT/X these days when ISC is clearly more
> >suckless IMHO: because it has less LOL (lines of license ;-) Cheers.
>
> I refuse to have anything to do with the people responsible for
> BIND, ISC dhcp, and ISC ntp. They can do no right in my eyes. At
> any rate, there's nothing wrong with the MIT license. It takes a
> few seconds longer to read and is just as clear. Plus, it
> explicitly extends its rights to the documentation and
> explicitly allows for sublicensing, which ISC doesn't.
Dan Bernstein hates BIND, too. Use the DJB license: "Public domain"
Robert Ransom
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 15 2010 - 23:24:03 CEST