Re: [dev] [dwm] tagging interface (X event stuff)

From: Wolf Tivy <wtivy1_AT_my.bcit.ca>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:22:40 -0700

> As you can see, I misspoke earlier: the events have *exactly*
> the same time
> field.  Combining this with what I said about the queuing
> (the "atomic"
> insertion), I think you'll agree that doing XPeekEvent inside the
> KeyRelease handler, and discarding the pair of events if the time,
> keycode, etc fields match, is a sufficiently robust test.
>
> Also, though this may seem nasty, it is nice in the sense that all
> programs reacting to KeyPress events get key the same key repeat
> behavior 'for free'.

Well that's good news. Everything should be doable then. To bad about
no per-app turnoff tho. Thanks a lot! I should have this thing (alternative
tagging interface) done soon, then I will post.
Received on Wed Sep 22 2010 - 06:22:40 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 22 2010 - 06:24:03 CEST