Re: [dev] Re: [st] multibyte patch

From: cryptix <cryptix_AT_riseup.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:52:07 +0100

Hi,

On 13.11.2010, at 22:53, Damian Okrasa wrote:
> I removed the wchar_t completely, ...

great! After a small adaption it seems to work flawlessly.
In the form you posted, my compiler doesn't like the first constant B0.

st.c:65:8: error: expected identifier before numeric constant

Once I change 'B0' (to lets say 'BA') it compiles fine, though.
I guess hardcoding the bit-masks could be one way to put the new enum aside altogether.

P.s.:
On 13.11.2010, at 22:53, Damian Okrasa wrote:
> ..., added some UTF-8 parsing functions.

st.c:379:1: warning: ‘ulen’ defined but not used

Looks like you forgot to take one out again. ;)

Kind regards,

cryptix
Received on Sun Nov 14 2010 - 17:52:07 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 14 2010 - 18:24:02 CET