Re: [dev][st] multibyte patch

2010/11/14, cryptix <cryptix_AT_riseup.net>:
> Hi,
>
> On 13.11.2010, at 22:53, Damian Okrasa wrote:
>> I removed the wchar_t completely, ...
>
> great! After a small adaption it seems to work flawlessly.
> In the form you posted, my compiler doesn't like the first constant B0.
>
> st.c:65:8: error: expected identifier before numeric constant
>
> Once I change 'B0' (to lets say 'BA') it compiles fine, though.
> I guess hardcoding the bit-masks could be one way to put the new enum aside
> altogether.

B0 is defined to 0 somewhere (bits/termios.h?) so it becomes enum { 0=1, ... };
Received on Mon Nov 15 2010 - 00:53:42 CET