Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

From: Kurt H Maier <karmaflux_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:38:08 -0500

the slackware people peat on policykit unitl it worked without pam,
why are we moving the other direction

-- 
# Kurt H Maier

Received on Tue Nov 16 2010 - 14:38:08 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Džen: "Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support"
Previous message: pancake: "Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support"
In reply to: pancake: "Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support"
Next in thread: Uriel: "Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support"
Reply: Uriel: "Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 16 2010 - 14:48:02 CET