Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

From: Uriel <uriel_AT_berlinblue.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:16:55 +0100

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Kurt H Maier <karmaflux_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> the slackware people peat on policykit unitl it worked without pam,
> why are we moving the other direction

Because I suspect 'suckless' should be renamed 'suckass'. The amount
of totally retarded evil shit that gets proposed in this list is
astounding.

And Glenda bless Slackware and OpenBSD from standing against the
idiotic insanity that is PAM.

uriel

> --
> # Kurt H Maier
>
>
Received on Tue Nov 16 2010 - 18:16:55 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 16 2010 - 18:24:02 CET