Re: [dev] which minimal os

From: Benjamin Cathey <>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:33:53 -0500

AHhh HahahahHAHAHAHahaha

On 02/11/2011 05:26 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> well, as long as we're all just spouting crap
> gentoo is a pile of shit suitable only for children. where is that guy
> who couldn't change cursors because of gentoo's "optimizations"? he
> should chime in.
> archlinux is just gentoo but less well maintained.
> debian is a bloated monstrosity -- anyone who thinks debconf is a good
> idea is wrong and probably dangerously incompetent.
> ubuntu has all the drawbacks of debian with all the incompetence of arch linux.
> netbsd is run by crackpots.
> freebsd is decent but not as nice as openbsd, although it's better at
> scaling up with smp.
> in the end, it doesn't matter which one you run, because you are using
> wmii, and nothing will ever work correctly anyway. switch to a
> maintained window manager and then worry about which bloated pile of
> unreliable garbage you'd like to run underneath it.
Received on Sat Feb 12 2011 - 00:33:53 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Feb 12 2011 - 00:36:03 CET