Re: [dev] Re: musl libc

I have packaged musl in slpm* and it xompiles pretty nicely. The code os clean and short and a static hello world takes 2.5KB. Which is great.

I have been statically linking other programs with slpm and musl and i got some headaches like missing definitions in some include files an so on. But i think its worth to try.

hg clone http://hg.youterm.com/slpm

Have fun

On 16/02/2011, at 18:35, finkler <finkler_AT_officinamentis.org> wrote:

> On 02/12/11 19:48, pmarin wrote:
>> Have anyone tried it?
>> http://www.etalabs.net/musl/
>>
>>
> Looks promising!
>
>
Received on Wed Feb 16 2011 - 18:44:04 CET