On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Al Gest <himselfe_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Evasive answer.
The question did not warrant more.
> That doesn't provide any substance or merit to your belligerence.
> Vitriol has also been seethed many times in the past on this very
> list. You seem perfectly happy to provide redundant vitriol, so why
> not provide the allegedly redundant 'why' as well?
I already have. In this thread. Try to keep up.
-- # Kurt H MaierReceived on Fri May 06 2011 - 05:49:23 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 06 2011 - 06:00:06 CEST