On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Al Gest <himselfe_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> It clearly did, the problem is the question was fairly loaded, and
> answering the question honestly would have contradicted your position.
No, you tremendous ass. The question was framed to insult me if I'd
answered it. It's also irrelevant, because nobody is 'experiementing'
here. There are other routes for 'experimentation.'
> Indeed you have, which I find quite ironic. I was responding to the
> specific e-mail where you implied that providing an explanation would
> be redundant (before of course endeavoring to provide one anyway). My
> question was more in the general sense, so you don't always come
> across like an angry nerd.
I'm not interested in how you think I come across. Fortunately,
idiots like you don't control my speech.
-- # Kurt H MaierReceived on Fri May 06 2011 - 06:06:16 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 06 2011 - 06:12:04 CEST