Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

From: hiro <23hiro_AT_googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 23:48:08 +0200

> complicated? is the most simple implementation for storing data. why non
> transparent?

I'm not sure I understood the whole concept yet, will have to do some
more reading.
I guess I'm making it more difficult than it is...
Received on Sat May 07 2011 - 23:48:08 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Wolf Tivy: "RE: [dev] dwm"
Previous message: hiro: "Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"
In reply to: pancake: "Re: [dev] Sup and dmc"
Next in thread: Uriel: "Re: [dev] Sup and dmc"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun May 08 2011 - 00:00:07 CEST