Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

From: Uriel <uriel_AT_berlinblue.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:44:11 +0200

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:26 AM, hiro <23hiro_AT_googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Dillo is not really designed to be ported to use other toolkits
>
> Well, that's one more point for dillo then...

To be tied up to a C++ toolkit is not a plus.

uriel
Received on Fri May 13 2011 - 11:44:11 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bjartur Thorlacius: "Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"
Previous message: Jonathan Slark: "[surf] Downloading files (was: Re: [dev] st -e not working?)"
In reply to: hiro: "Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"
Next in thread: Wolf Tivy: "RE: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 13 2011 - 11:48:02 CEST