> FWIW, if one (as I do) always run a tmux instance on top of whatever X
> terminal one launches, neither the lack of scrollback buffer nor the
> double-click-and-drag selection should be on the TODO list, since these
> features are moot granted one uses tmux. In fact, I'd prefer they be
> treated as bloat.
You can't class tmux as suckless. I tried it and the amount of options
and commands etc. was intimidating!
It's a point though, do we need a suckless screen replacement? If you
use dwm you don't need it but lately I've been looking into cwm/tmux
instead.
Jon.
Received on Wed Jun 01 2011 - 02:54:54 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 01 2011 - 03:00:06 CEST