Re: [dev] revolution

From: Connor Lane Smith <>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 01:18:21 +0100

On 10 June 2011 22:19, Bryan Bennett <> wrote:
> WMFS simply feels like DWM++

You mean it increments dwm and takes the lower value?

On 11 June 2011 00:58, Bryan Bennett <> wrote:
> Kurt - I think you need to rethink your definition of "Troll". He simply
> asked a question.

Though the question was pretty meaningless. We get questions like this
a lot: "how is <wm> better or worse than dwm?" Let me put it this way:
do you need runtime configuration, Xft, EMWH, Imlib2, and a systray? I
don't, and I use tagging, so I think it's worse. What should I say,
"it's worse because it's bloated and lacks tagging"? Clearly you
disagree. So why not try the window manager and find out for yourself
how it is better or worse for you?

Received on Sat Jun 11 2011 - 02:18:21 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jun 11 2011 - 02:24:03 CEST