Re: [dev] wmii as a prepatched dwm

From: a.l.e <>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 18:16:12 +0200

hi connor,

> On 27 June 2011 08:13, a.l.e <> wrote:
> > this is the main reason why i prefer wmii to dwm: i don't want to
> > keep track of versions of dwm and of the patches i have applied.
> I can't help but think that the solution would be not to apply
> patches. You don't really need to.

i agree.

but i still prefer not to bother with applying patches at all.

> > at least: dynamic tags
> 'Dynamic' is a rather overloaded term, but dwm's tagging *is*
> dynamic... Moreso than wmii.

does it start with only tag and i can add tags when i need them?

i'm think of that kind of dynamic, not being able to add any window to
a specific tag...

Received on Sat Jul 02 2011 - 18:16:12 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jul 02 2011 - 18:24:04 CEST